To begin with, it continues to emphasize negative peace, despite its name. Yet the PPI still has many serious drawbacks. The PPI, launched in 2009, was supposed to recognize this and track positive peace, or the promotion of peacefulness through positive interactions like civility, cooperation and care. The GPI, launched in 2007 by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), was designed to measure negative peace, or the absence of violence, destructive conflict, and war. The Global Peace Index (GPI) and its complement the Positive Peace Index (PPI) rank 163 nations annually and are currently the leading measures of peacefulness. Unfortunately, our current ability to find these peaceful mechanisms is woefully inadequate. Learning from these societies, and identifying key drivers of harmony, is a vital process that can help promote world peace. It can come as a surprise to learn that there are scores of sustainably peaceful societies around the world, ranging from indigenous people in the Xingu River Basin in Brazil to countries in the European Union. Today, the misery of war is all too striking in places such as Syria, Yemen, Tigray, Myanmar and Ukraine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |